More advice from a learning-disabled individual

A commentary from Amy Temple:

For the past year, you have read about my experiences living with learning disabilities. I have shared moments of being bullied and harassed in school, and being discriminated against and rejected by family members, prospective employers and society as a whole because of my condition. I have described my feelings of anger and bitterness over the mistreatment, but I honestly felt so much worse than that. I didn’t trust anyone. I’m sure I missed out on great opportunities and relationships because I was so afraid of getting hurt.  READ MORE

Zirkel’s Legal Alert – November Update

This month’s update highlights two recent federal court decisions that are of general significance: (a) one with multiple issues that extend to evaluation and FAPE under Section 504, and (b) another that illustrates the employee “whistleblower” side of special education. Both decisions are not officially published and are at the trial court level, thus of limited precedential weight, but their issues contribute to practitioners’ legal currency. More detailed analyses of these various issues and related case law are available on the Publications page of perryzirkel.com.

Resources for Communicating with Parents

CADRE, the The Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education, has two new resources to support more collaborative and productive conversations between educators, administrators, and parents.

The updated Tale of Two Conversations is a two-part video series shows a parent of a child with a disability and a school administrator demonstrating poor communication skills and then provides the positive alternative. View the videos and study guide at https://www.cadreworks.org/resources/cadre-materials-state-resource/tale-two-conversations.

Considering Mediation for Special Education Disputes: A School Administrator’s Perspective is a pamphlet describing, from an administrators perspective, the benefits of participating in mediation to solve special education disputes between parents and educators.

Updates from OSEP

Mark Schultz Named New Assistant Secretary for OSERS

OSEP has welcomed Mark Schultz as the new Assistant Secretary for OSERS, the position recently vacated by Johnny Collett.  In addition to his new position, Mark is also the Rehabilitation Services Commissioner for OSERS.

Mark Schultz

Mark joined the Department in August after a long career in vocational rehabilitation. Most recently, Mark was a deputy commissioner at the Nebraska Department of Education where his division included the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation and the Office of Special Education. Prior to his role at the Nebraska Department of Education, he served as both the director and associate director with Nebraska Vocational Rehabilitation, director of the Nebraska Assistive Technology Partnership and as a barrier-free design specialist for the League of Human Dignity, a Center for Independent Living. He has also served as a president of the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation and a member of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Information Technology Steering Committee. (OSEP, 10-29-19).

 

Five Programs Funded by OSEP in Fiscal Year 2019

Promoting Rigorous Outcomes and Growth by Redesigning Educational Services for Students with Disabilities (PROGRESS Center). The PROGRESS Center will help private, public, and charter schools improve their capacity to design and implement high-quality, evidence-based educational programs to meet the standards of the Endrew F. decision. The expected outcomes are an increase in knowledge, awareness, and use of resources to improve quality and implementation, and ultimately an ecosystem of educators who can design and implement quality special education programs. Its website will launch soon.

National Center for Systemic Improvement (NCSI). NCSI will provide differentiated support to states through universal, targeted, and intensive technical assistance to help states best use their general supervision and professional development systems to establish and meet high expectations for each child with a disability.

National Center on Accessible Educational Materials (AEM 2.0). AEM 2.0 will continue improving systems that provide accessible educational materials and technologies for individuals with disabilities in early learning, K-12, higher education, and workforce settings.

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy Center). The DaSy Center will provide technical assistance to (1) improve states’ capacity to collect, report, analyze and use high-quality IDEA Part C data required under IDEA sections 618 and 616 and IDEA Part B preschool data for those indicators that are not solely based on IDEA section 618 data (e.g., Indicators B7 and B12); and (2) enhance, streamline, and integrate statewide child-level early childhood data systems to address critical policy questions that will facilitate program improvement, improve compliance accountability, and improve outcomes for children served under Part C and Part B preschool special education programs.

IDEA Data Center (IDC). IDC provides technical assistance to build state capacity for collecting, reporting, analyzing, and using IDEA Part B data, including preschool data. IDC also provides technical assistance to local education agencies (LEA), in partnership with states, to improve LEA data quality.Site Logo

Assistant Secretary Johnny Collett Leaving Department of Education

In a move that seemed to take everyone by surprise, Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services (OSERS) Johnny Collett announced his resignation as of today.  He has indicated that he is returning to Kentucky to spend more time with his family. Collett has served as the head of the agency since his 2017 nomination to the post.  Mark Shultz, who has been commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration since August, will take on the role as Assistant Secretary in an acting capacity.
Collett is known for his initiative to “rethink special education.” Read More

Recent OSEP Policy Letters Address a Variety of Issues

Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) published four policy letters addressing a variety of issues:

July 3Letter to Zirkel addresses a series of questions regarding a state educational agency’s complaint procedures, in particular, resolution of state complaints and enforcement actions.

September 9: Letter to Anonymous addresses questions regarding: (1) the participation of children with disabilities in IEP team meetings and other meetings held to discuss the results of testing, the child’s evaluation or reevaluation, or the child’s identified disability category (particularly secondary transition-aged youth); and (2) provision of assessment reports to meeting participants, including the parents, prior to the meeting at which the assessment results will be discussed.

September 9: Letter to Rowland addresses a series of questions regarding the development of IEPs of children placed in certain preschool programs, including whether a public agency may restrict the provision of a specific related service based solely on the child’s placement in a particular program.

September 17: Increasing Postsecondary Opportunities and Success for Students and Youth with Disabilities describes how state educational agencies, local educational agencies, and state vocational rehabilitation agencies may coordinate to assist students and youth with disabilities, including students and youth with intellectual disabilities who are in high school and at postsecondary education institutions, through appropriate supports funded under the IDEA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by Title IV of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

OSEP’s Effective Personnel for ALL: Attract, Prepare, Retain Initiative

Throughout the year, the U.S. Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has made a focused effort to support States in their work to address special education personnel shortages.  This effort has included a symposia series and other targeted activities.  Currently, OSEP is inviting the public share their  thoughts on how they can best support States in their work to Attract, Prepare, and Retain Effective Personnel. Sharing challenges and successes can make a difference for others facing similar challenges.

Comments can be posted to the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Blog with the comment period ending September 30, 2019.

OSPI Legislative Reports on Social Emotional Learning in Washington’s K–12 Schools are Now Available

Executive Summary

Social emotional learning (SEL) is broadly understood to be a process through which people build awareness and skills in managing emotions, setting goals, establishing relationships, and making responsible decisions. Research highlighted in this report demonstrates that the effective integration of SEL in school systems creates a foundation for students’ increased school and life success. The Social Emotional Learning Indicators (SELI) Workgroup was established in 2017 to build upon the work of the previous Social Emotional Learning Benchmarks (SELB) Workgroup. Committed to focusing on the whole child, the SELI Workgroup applied guiding principles to ensure that statewide SEL work promotes equity and is culturally responsive, trauma-informed, and universally designed for access by all learners. Recommended actions for the SEL Advisory Committee (to be formed by OSPI as required in Senate Bill 5082 [2019]), each of which is dependent on meaningful engagement of diverse stakeholders, include the following:

    • Intentionally enhance, communicate, and disseminate SEL implementation resources.
    • Support capacity building for the implementation and integration of SEL in school systems and communities.
    • Evaluate, co-design, and continually improve SEL resources and implementation efforts to ensure they are effective, aligned with community priorities, and culturally responsive.

The contents of the report along with appendices can be found here.